Last night after the show I checked my e-mail and found my first "Love Mail" since starting at WWNC.
This is truly a milestone!
Some background, first....
On Tuesday's show, we discussed whether the deputy shooting of a 17-year old driver seemed justified, based on the reports we've read.
I read the initial reporting from the Asheville Citizen-Times newspaper, and opened the phone lines to hear your thoughts on the matter. One caller named John started off the 5:00 hour of the show by arguing that the deputy did not have to shoot the 17-year old driver to get him to stop backing the Chevy Silverado into another cruiser. John said the two deputies inside the cruiser could have escaped and he did not believe the police reports that the two deputies were pinned inside the vehicle (prompting the third deputy to open fire into the cabin of the truck).
You can listen to John's call here. It starts at about the 02:00 mark.
Based on the response after his call, it seemed nobody agreed with John.
Until last night, when I got this e-mail:

I drafted a reply to Mr. Sneed, but thought I might want to get some more input before sending it off. After all, he is a longtime local attorney and I am merely a lowly radio host. So, any advice on how to respond to this?
Thanks!
In case you can't read the e-mail, here is the transcription:
Pete: Logic is based on deductive reasoning from known facts and known observed phenomena. You say you were a reporter. If so, you know that press info supplied by an interested party is suspect and subject to spin and omitted facts. Further as an observer of the Citizen Times, you know that it is rare that they get any story exactly right. You further know that the only sources for the story were the deputies and the boy’s mother. Finally you should know that there are seasoned police officers that would react like John (who by the way ate your lunch today) and that there are a lot of young cowboys on every police force. Finally your experience would show that it is not likely that the reporter got up at 3.00 a.m. or that ,if he did ,he got to view the crime scene before anything was moved. These points lead ineluctably to the conclusion that today you were a knucklehead.
You can rest assured that the boy will be charged with attempted murder, threatened with life in prison, forced to plead to something that will prevent a trial and any revelation as to what actually happened. As a self professed libertarian, some investigation of these points and some of the implications for a free society would be useful-but what about your ratings-oh well. A Sneed





